Jordan signs the Copenhagen Accord

February 10, 2010

I think it is news – not because it is fresh – but because no other to my knowledge has reported on it. Jordan joined as the first of so far only two Arab countries the Copenhagen Accord on 31st of January. Jordan signed on to the result of the COP15 and submitted its mitigation plan for combating Climate change. The result of COP15 might not have been what we all hoped for, but it was a first step and it seems that it is gaining momentum as the basis for the next Climate agreement.

On the same note Jordan is taking the lead in the region on discussing climate change and energy efficiency. Within the last ten days two well prepared and well attended energy conferences (RCREEE, JRES) have taken place in Jordan. Please note the highly interesting country report on Jordan. It is my feeling that with the new law on Renewable Energy both government and in particular private entrepreneurs and investors are beginning to take these issues seriously – and for good reasons – it is a national challenge and there is money and jobs to be made.


Making Healt Care Efficient

January 12, 2010

Here is something that Jordan could replicate – being a medical hub and focusing on IT - from New York Times today.

Denmark Leads the Way in Digital Care

By SINDYA N. BHANOO
Published: January 11, 2010
COPENHAGEN — Jens Danstrup, a 77-year-old retired architect, used to bike all around town. But years of smoking have weakened his lungs, and these days he finds it difficult to walk down his front steps and hail a taxi for a doctor’s appointment.

Mr. Danstrup, who finds it difficult to walk down his front steps, can go to the doctor without leaving home, using some simple medical devices and a notebook computer with a Web camera.

Now, however, he can go to the doctor without leaving home, using some simple medical devices and a notebook computer with a Web camera. He takes his own weekly medical readings, which are sent to his doctor via a Bluetooth connection and automatically logged into an electronic record.

“You see how easy it is for me?” Mr. Danstrup said, sitting at his desk while video chatting with his nurse at Frederiksberg University Hospital, a mile away. “Instead of wasting the day at the hospital?”

He clipped an electronic pulse reader to his finger. It logged his reading and sent it to his doctor. Mr. Danstrup can also look up his personal health record online. His prescriptions are paperless — his doctors enters them electronically, and any pharmacy in the country can pull them up. Any time he wants to get in touch with his primary care doctor, he sends an e-mail message.

All of this is possible because Mr. Danstrup lives in Denmark, a country that began embracing electronic health records and other health care information technology a decade ago. Today, virtually all primary care physicians and nearly half of the hospitals use electronic records, and officials are trying to encourage more “telemedicine” projects like the one started at Frederiksberg by Dr. Klaus Phanareth, a physician there.

Several studies, including one to be published later this month by the Commonwealth Fund, conclude that the Danish information system is the most efficient in the world, saving doctors an average of 50 minutes a day in administrative work. And a 2008 report from the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society estimated that electronic record keeping saved Denmark’s health system as much as $120 million a year.

Now policy makers in the United States are studying Denmark’s system to see whether its successes can be replicated as part of the overhaul of the health system making its way through Congress. Dr. David Blumenthal, a professor of health care policy at Harvard Medical School who was named by President Obama as national coordinator of health information technology, has said the United States is “well behind” Denmark and its Scandinavian neighbors, Sweden and Norway, in the use of electronic health records.

Denmark’s success has much to do with the its small size, its homogeneous population and its regulated health care system — on all counts, very different from the United States. As in much of Europe, health care in Denmark is financed by taxes, and most services are free.

“It was a natural progression for us,” said Otto Larsen, director of the agency that regulates the system. “We believe in taking care of our people, and we had believed this was the right way to go.”

He and others acknowledged that the system is hardly perfect. It faces budget constraints , and the country is still refining common standards for electronic health records.

“We’re trying to streamline now,” Mr. Larsen said. “There are too many systems out there.”

And he is pushing to use still more information technology and to encourage more initiatives like the telemedicine project at Fredriksberg Hospital.

At Thy-Mors Hospital in the rural region of North Jutland, doctors are using I.B.M. software that pulls data from a patient’s electronic health record and superimposes it on a three-dimensional image of a human body, allowing doctors to quickly get an overview of the person’s medical history. The doctor can rotate the image, zoom in and click on ailments to get more information.

The ambulances have access to electronic medical records, so medical technicians can update them for the doctors even as patients are on their way to the emergency room.

Kurt Nielsen, the hospital’s director, says that while the doctors are not particularly adept at information technology, they have gradually embraced it. And it helps that the staff was involved in developing the innovations.

“My staff at the hospital is very, very satisfied,” he said. “We build these systems in an incremental way, and seek their input throughout.”

It remains an open question what lessons from Denmark, a nation of six million people, can be transferred to the United States.

“Denmark is probably the most advanced country in the world that I have seen,” said Denis J. Protti, a professor of health information technology at the University of Victoria in British Columbia and an author of the Commonwealth Fund study. “Of course, it’s the same size as some of your states.”

Culturally, Danes are also different. Mr. Larsen, of Denmark’s health information agency, says his countrymen have few objections to the national patient registry — perhaps because they have different priorities from Americans when it comes to medical privacy.

“As long you are a healthy man, you fear for your privacy,” he said. “It is when you are sick that you wish people knew what your problem was.”

Still, Dr. Protti and other experts say the Danish experience shows that using electronic health records is efficient, cost-effective — and doable, with a little work.

Dr. John D. Halamka, another adviser to the Obama administration on electronic health records, says Denmark offers the United States a peek into the future, with some logistical variations.

Dr. Halamka, the chief information officer at Harvard Medical School, doubts that the United States will ever have a national patient registry, but he thinks that electronic medical records can succeed as long as patients have control over their own records.

Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital in Boston, where Dr. Halamka is a practicing emergency room physician, was one of the first hospitals in the nation to adopt electronic health records, a decade ago. It remains in a minority — about 10 percent of American hospitals and about 17 percent of American doctors use electronic records, according to studies published in The New England Journal of Medicine.

Two of the nation’s most robust users of electronic health records are the Department of Veterans’ Affairs and the Kaiser Permanente health system. Last week, the two jointly announced that with patient authorization, electronic health records can now be shared between the systems.

At Beth Israel, patients can choose to store their electronic health records using several kinds of programs — Google Health, Microsoft Healthvault or the hospital’s own software — and they control access to their records. In the veterans’ system and at Kaiser Permanente, patients have access to their own health records.

Another challenge is the United States’ sheer size, with 50 state governments and a multiplicity of privacy laws.

Dr. Halamka is vice chairman of a federal advisory panel that has established national standards for electronic health records, meant to help states, hospitals, doctors and patients using various types of software to store their records to share information.

“The standards have been set for parties to communicate,” he said. “There’s hope, and we’re on the right trajectory.”

In Denmark, meanwhile, advocates of information technology are eager to share advice — and enthusiasm.

Mr. Nielsen, of Thy-Mors Hospital, said the transition must be gradual.

“It was done throughout some years,” he said. “It is important to know that it did not happen instantly.”

Back at the 150-year-old Frederiksberg University Hospital in Copenhagen, a nurse, Steffen Hogg Christensen, was preparing medical information kits like the one Mr. Danstrup uses.

Health information technology is no easy task, Mr. Christensen said. Training colleagues and elderly patients can be daunting and time-consuming.

“But isn’t it amazing, how innovative we can be?” he said, smiling broadly. “And all in these old walls.”


Tell the Truth about the Cartoons IAF!

January 10, 2010

UPDATE: It seems that IAF have issued a new statement on their homepage retracting the one mentioned below.  The embassy had a meeting with the IAF earlier today about this issue. Unfortunately, the original statement is already widespread on the Net – but I guess it is better to get a retraction in words if not deeds instead of nothing. Anyway, at least they admitted their “mistake”.

- – o 0 o -  -

According to Ammonnews of 10.01.2010 the Islamic Action Front (the Jordanian Muslim Brotherhood political party) has issued a statement (Arabic / English) about reprint of the cartoons. The content of the statement is pure fabrication. It seems to me, that the IAF could be publishing this untrue statement to “fuel hatred and hostility between peoples” to quote from their statement, unless of course it is an  unprofessional way of trying to get some headlines in the local press.

IAF claim that 17 Danish newspapers reprinted the cartoons last Wednesday in solidarity with the cartoonist after the police revealed a plot to kill him. This is absolutely untrue. No cartoons have been reprinted by the Danish press overall last Wednesday or any other day this year or last year for that matter. Last print was almost two years ago.

The IAF is also blaming the Arab and Islamic world for their silence. I certainly understand that silence – since nothing was reprinted in Denmark. And by the way – not all kept silent. The Organization of Islamic Countries did issue a statement but with a totally different content than the IAF.

The OIC General Secretariat condemns the reported attempt on the life of Danish cartoonist. Date: 03/01/2010

A spokesman of the General Secretariat of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) in Jeddah condemned and expressed concern on the reported attempt on the life of the Danish cartoonist, who drawn the offensive and derogatory cartoons of Prophet Mohammed (PBUH) in 2005.

The OIC spokesperson stated that if the alleged attempt on the life of the Danish cartoonist is proven to have been committed as a reaction to the infamous cartoons of 2005, then it should be rejected and condemned by all Muslims unequivocally as it runs totally against the teachings and values of Islam.

Either IAF is acting in bad faith – a paradox for a movement based on Faith – or they don’t know how to check their facts. Neither supports their credibility as a responsible political party.

For those interested this is what happened. On the first day of the New Year a man armed with an axe and a knife broke into the cartoonist’s house in an attempt to murder him. The cartoonist fled into a safe room while the police shot and wounded the perpetrator. The story was reported extensively all over the world including in Arabic and Jordanian media. The terrorist attack was also widely debated in the Danish press but no republication of the cartoons took place.

So what the IAF could have done – but obviously missed an opportunity to do – was to distance themselves from the murder attempt and in that way distance themselves from terrorism. Maybe it is too much to ask for?

For coverage in the international press check BBC, CNN, Al Jazeera or google.

As regards Ammonnews I have tried to post a short comment refuting the IAF statement, but somehow Ammon does not accept my comment. If somebody could mention this post on Ammon and in Arabic I would be very grateful.


The Day After – COP15

December 23, 2009

The Climate summit in Copenhagen last weekend was highly dramatic. I sad glued to the screen for from Thursday evening until Saturday morning – thanks to internet TV.

Expectations was sat very high – in hindsight probably too high to be achievable – and many of us was disappointed by the less-than-perfect outcome. None the less there is a Copenhagen Accord between the major CO2 emitters of the world and we now have a framework for working towards a binding and hopefully ambitious agreement next year.

The Copenhagen Accord recognizes the scientific case for keeping temperature rises below 2°C, but does not contain commitments for reduced emissions that would be necessary to achieve that aim. One part of the agreement pledges US$ 30 billion to the developing world over the next three years, rising to US$ 100 billion per year by 2020, to help poor countries adapt to climate change. Earlier proposals that would have aimed to limit temperature rises to 1.5°C and cut CO2 emissions by 80% by 2050 were dropped.

The Copenhagen Accord is open for all countries to sign on to – and I expect that we will see a serious push from major players to get as many as possible to subscribe to the Accord during January.

There is an immensely amount of links to the reactions to the Copenhagen Accord and the Summit itself. For a good overview and links to sources I recommend the Wiki page on the COP15.

For Jordanian reactions Jordan Times had an article today – please notice how Jordan sees the glass half full regarding the COP15 outcome.

I have mentioned earlier that COP15 was very much intended as an interactive and multimedia event from the side of the organizers. Some facts on this:

The COP15 page/video on YouTube was shown to 10 mio. viewers. 350.000 visitors on the most visited day. 1000 videos uploaded and 4000 questions on Cop15 sent. 15.000 climate greetings were sent to the participants of the COP15. “Copenhagen” became at one point the most used search criteria on Google and one of the most used on Twitter.


King Abdullah on Climate Change

December 18, 2009

The Climate summit in Copenhagen is entering its last 24 hours. It will be a cliff hanger – nobody knows if a serious result will be achieved tomorrow – but substantial efforts are being put into sealing the deal as I write. The negotiations are gaining new momentum as Heads of State and Government convene in Copenhagen.

HRH Prince Hamzah delivered the Jordanian statement on behalf of king Abdullah earlier tonight in Copenhagen. I saw it on Danish TV and Petra News reported it on the wire and in Jordan Times. I was very happy to notice that renewable energy and water were the centre points of the Jordanian statement:

King: Int’l community urged to combat climate change

Copenhagen, Dec. 17 (Petra)–His Majesty King Abdullah II on Thursday urged int’l community to bear its responsibility to protect the future of humanity through preserving environment and combating climate change.

The King, in a speech delivered on his behalf by chief of Jordan’s delegation to Climate Change Conference held in the Danish capital, Prince Hamzah Ben Hussein, said the Kingdom supports global efforts to reach an effective and fair climate deal, underling the Kingdom will be a true partner in carrying out recommendations and conventions embraced by the int’l community.

Adapting to implications of climate change, the King added, needs allocating further financial resources by industrial countries, hoping the effectiveness of the Adaptation Fund reaches the appropriate level to meet the basic needs of the developing countries, deemed highly affected by this phenomenon.

Jordan is a substantial partner in the global effort aimed to combat the problem of climate change and set a host of ambitious goals on the national level to optimize use of renewable energy to 10 pct. of preliminary energy needs by 2020, which is inspired by the New National Energy Strategy, the King added.

“Priority should focus on supporting and protecting counties most affected by climate change, archipelago states and those battling desertification or water scarcity, “His Majesty underlined.

“The Mideast and Arab countries are directly affected by this phenomenon, namely the water sector. Consequently, the dearth of water resources reflects on food production, biodiversity and ecosystems,” the King pointed out.

Jordan now battles a severe shortage of water on the medium run, which makes it the 4th poorest country worldwide in terms of the individual’s water ratio, the King added, saying the climate challenges, which exacerbate scarcity of water resources , exposes Jordan to tough and limited options to ensure availability of water.

“Thus, the Kingdom is currently carrying out a range of mega projects to develop unconventional water resources, namely the conveyance and desalination of Red Sea water,” His Majesty added.

/Petra/AG